Lady Godiva - Revision history

Wjhonson at 01:03, 25 January 2010

2010-01-25T01:03:21Z

Wjhonson at 22:07, 25 August 2008

2008-08-25T22:07:37Z

Wjhonson: /* Further reading */

2008-02-07T04:39:49Z

‎Further reading

Wjhonson: /* Anglo-Saxon Charters */

2008-01-03T17:38:29Z

‎Anglo-Saxon Charters

Wjhonson: /* Anglo-Saxon Charters */

2008-01-03T17:38:06Z

‎Anglo-Saxon Charters

Wjhonson: /* Anglo-Saxon Charters */

2008-01-03T17:36:45Z

‎Anglo-Saxon Charters

Wjhonson: /* Anglo-Saxon Charters */

2008-01-03T17:35:48Z

‎Anglo-Saxon Charters

Wjhonson: /* Domesday */

2007-09-03T21:29:46Z

‎Domesday

Wjhonson: /* Domesday */

2007-09-03T21:28:47Z

‎Domesday

Wjhonson: /* Domesday */

2007-09-03T21:28:14Z

‎Domesday

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:03, 25 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Lady Godiva''', real and semi-mythical figure from early England		'''Lady Godiva''', real and semi-mythical figure from early England
		+
		+	<center>
		+	<table style="border-color: rgb(136, 136, 136); border-width: 1px; border-collapse: collapse;" border="1" bordercolor="#888888" cellspacing="0" width="287" height="75">
		+	<tr>
		+	<td>
		+	<center>I am a professional genealogist. Contact me, if you'd like help in tracing your family tree, by clicking the below button.</center>
		+	<br>
		+
		+	<center>[http://www.countyhistorian.com/cecilweb/index.php/Rates_and_Hours http://i.keen.com/D1_cb-call-now-136x40_V5.gif]</center>
		+	</td>
		+	</tr>
		+	</table>
		+	</center>
		+	<br>

	<blockquote>		<blockquote>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 25 August 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Copyright 2007, Will Johnson, [mailto:wjhonson@aol.com wjhonson@aol.com], Professional Genealogist, All Rights Reserved. This page is locked, if you'd like to add or correct anything, please email me.	+	'''Lady Godiva''', real and semi-mythical figure from early England
		+
		+	<blockquote>
		+	Copyright 2007-2008, Will Johnson, [mailto:wjhonson@aol.com wjhonson@aol.com], Professional Genealogist, All Rights Reserved. This page is locked, if you'd like to add or correct anything, please email me. I am available for hire to assist you to trace your family or create a biography of you or your relative. I charge $25 per hour.
		+	</blockquote>

	If you enjoy the research done here, consider making a [http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_xclick&business=wjhonson@aol.com&amount=15.00&item_name=Lady_Godiva_Fund financial contribution] to keep research like this going.		If you enjoy the research done here, consider making a [http://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_xclick&business=wjhonson@aol.com&amount=15.00&item_name=Lady_Godiva_Fund financial contribution] to keep research like this going.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 7 February 2008
Line 152:		Line 152:
	*Paulvheath recommends in a posting to Gen-Medieval 14 Aug 2007 the book "Anglo-Saxon Bishops, Kings and Nobles" by W G Searle (1899), stating "He summarized the information known about Anglo-Saxon genealogies up to that time and carefully cited his sources, which can therefore be checked."		*Paulvheath recommends in a posting to Gen-Medieval 14 Aug 2007 the book "Anglo-Saxon Bishops, Kings and Nobles" by W G Searle (1899), stating "He summarized the information known about Anglo-Saxon genealogies up to that time and carefully cited his sources, which can therefore be checked."
	Doug McDonald in a posting to Gen-Medieval 14 Aug 2007 cites a source : Walter Lee Sheppard, "Are you a descendant of Lady Godiva", National Genealogical Society Quarterly*, vol. 50, no. 2 [June 1962], pp. 74-78		Doug McDonald in a posting to Gen-Medieval 14 Aug 2007 cites a source : Walter Lee Sheppard, "Are you a descendant of Lady Godiva", National Genealogical Society Quarterly*, vol. 50, no. 2 [June 1962], pp. 74-78
		+
		+	[[Category:Middle Ages]]
		+	[[Category:England]]
		+	[[Category:Famous Women]]

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 *Terry Booth in a posting to Gen-Medieval 23 Aug 2007 states :
 **"Aelfgar the Earl's son ('Alfger þe Erles sune') appears as a witness in ASC document S1531 (Will of Thurstan, son of Wine) dated (1043 x 1045) - noted as probably authentic. Unless it can be shown this is not earl Leofric's son, it would be the earliest record for him [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1531 Citation]. He is also a witness as 'Aelfgar nobilis' in the 'probably authentic' S1019 (dated to 1049) which his father 'Leofric dux' as well as 'Godwine dux' and 'Harold dux' also witnessed [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1019 Citation]. The 1049 date suggests that assigning him an earldom before then is probably incorrect, and that Florence is probably right in dating the start of Aelfgar's 'temporary' earlship to Sep 1051 (after Godwine had fled to Flanders).
 **"ASC document S1042 (20/24 May 1065) - noted as probably authentic - may be the earliest mention of son Eadwine as earl - 'Eadwine dux'. This record would also prove that Morcar had not yet been named to replace earl Tostig/Tosti. [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1042 Citation]. This is consistent with ASC's statement that Morcar/Morkar was named earl 'the eve of St. Simon's and St. Jude's mass' in 1965 [http://books.google.com/books?id=4jEIAAAAQAAJ&pg=coverpage#PPA438,M1 citation], which Florence dates to 28 Oct 1065 [http://books.google.com/books?id=gpR0iz5GjYgC&pg=RA1-PA486&vq=godiva#PRA1-PA167,M1 Citation]
 **"If one presumes that Aelfgar's sons Eadwine and Morcar were both of age when acting as earls in 1065 (one being of course older), and that dau Aeldgyth/Ealdgyth was a mother abt 1057, Aelfgar was prob a father and m. by 1040 if not earlier. If Aelfgar was the witness to the 1045 will (which presumably required him to be of age), that suggests he was b. at least by 1025. He was d. bef 20/24 May 1065, when his son Eadwine had succeeded him as earl.
 **If one instead accepts the suggestion that Eadwine and Morcar were mere 16 and 18 year-old teenagers when named earls (proof not seen), they would have been b. as late as 1046 and 1048. This could move Aelfgar's marriage date closer to 1045 dependant on the birthdate presumed for Ealdgyth. The brothers would then be 17 and 19 when Florence writes that on the eve of 20 Sep 1066, "before the king's arrival, the two brothers, Edwin and Morcar, at the head of a large army, fought a battle with the Norwegians on the northern bank of the river Ouse, near York.". If they were indeed brash young teenagers who wouldn't take advice from anyone, that could explain why they lost that battle. 5 days later, Harold defeated the same enemy at Stanford Bridge. Killing, among others, 'earl Tosti', the man whose earldom of Northumbria had been granted Morcar les than a year earlier."

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 **[http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=get&type=charter&id=1233 Charter S1233] : "Godiva (Godgifu), wife of Leofric, to St Mary's, Stow..."
-*Terry Booth in a posting to Gen-Medieval 23 Aug 2007 states :<blockquote>"Aelfgar the Earl's son ('Alfger þe Erles sune') appears as a witness in ASC document S1531 (Will of Thurstan, son of Wine) dated (1043 x 1045) - noted as probably authentic. Unless it can be shown this is not earl Leofric's son, it would be the earliest record for him [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1531 Citation]. He is also a witness as 'Aelfgar nobilis' in the 'probably authentic' S1019 (dated to 1049) which his father 'Leofric dux' as well as 'Godwine dux' and 'Harold dux' also witnessed [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1019 Citation]. The 1049 date suggests that assigning him an earldom before then is probably incorrect, and that Florence is probably right in dating the start of Aelfgar's 'temporary' earlship to Sep 1051 (after Godwine had fled to Flanders).</blockquote>
+*Terry Booth in a posting to Gen-Medieval 23 Aug 2007 states :
-<blockquote>ASC document S1042 (20/24 May 1065) - noted as probably authentic - may be the earliest mention of son Eadwine as earl - 'Eadwine dux'. This record would also prove that Morcar had not yet been named to replace earl Tostig/Tosti. [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1042 Citation]. This is consistent with ASC's statement that Morcar/Morkar was named earl 'the eve of St. Simon's and St. Jude's mass' in 1965 [http://books.google.com/books?id=4jEIAAAAQAAJ&pg=coverpage#PPA438,M1 citation], which Florence dates to 28 Oct 1065 [http://books.google.com/books?id=gpR0iz5GjYgC&pg=RA1-PA486&vq=godiva#PRA1-PA167,M1 Citation]</blockquote>
+**"ASC document S1042 (20/24 May 1065) - noted as probably authentic - may be the earliest mention of son Eadwine as earl - 'Eadwine dux'. This record would also prove that Morcar had not yet been named to replace earl Tostig/Tosti. [http://www.anglo-saxons.net/hwaet/?do=seek&query=S+1042 Citation]. This is consistent with ASC's statement that Morcar/Morkar was named earl 'the eve of St. Simon's and St. Jude's mass' in 1965 [http://books.google.com/books?id=4jEIAAAAQAAJ&pg=coverpage#PPA438,M1 citation], which Florence dates to 28 Oct 1065 [http://books.google.com/books?id=gpR0iz5GjYgC&pg=RA1-PA486&vq=godiva#PRA1-PA167,M1 Citation]
-<blockquote>If one presumes that Aelfgar's sons Eadwine and Morcar were both of age when acting as earls in 1065 (one being of course older), and that dau Aeldgyth/Ealdgyth was a mother abt 1057, Aelfgar was prob a father and m. by 1040 if not earlier. If Aelfgar was the witness to the 1045 will (which presumably required him to be of age), that suggests he was b. at least by 1025. He was d. bef 20/24 May 1065, when his son Eadwine had succeeded him as earl.</blockquote>
+**"If one presumes that Aelfgar's sons Eadwine and Morcar were both of age when acting as earls in 1065 (one being of course older), and that dau Aeldgyth/Ealdgyth was a mother abt 1057, Aelfgar was prob a father and m. by 1040 if not earlier. If Aelfgar was the witness to the 1045 will (which presumably required him to be of age), that suggests he was b. at least by 1025. He was d. bef 20/24 May 1065, when his son Eadwine had succeeded him as earl.
-<blockqoute>If one instead accepts the suggestion that Eadwine and Morcar were mere 16 and 18 year-old teenagers when named earls (proof not seen), they would have been b. as late as 1046 and 1048. This could move Aelfgar's marriage date closer to 1045 dependant on the birthdate presumed for Ealdgyth. The brothers would then be 17 and 19 when Florence writes that on the eve of 20 Sep 1066, "before the king's arrival, the two brothers, Edwin and Morcar, at the head of a large army, fought a battle with the Norwegians on the northern bank of the river Ouse, near York.". If they were indeed brash young teenagers who wouldn't take advice from anyone, that could explain why they lost that battle. 5 days later, Harold defeated the same enemy at Stanford Bridge. Killing, among others, 'earl Tosti', the man whose earldom of Northumbria had been granted Morcar les than a year earlier."</blockquote>
+**If one instead accepts the suggestion that Eadwine and Morcar were mere 16 and 18 year-old teenagers when named earls (proof not seen), they would have been b. as late as 1046 and 1048. This could move Aelfgar's marriage date closer to 1045 dependant on the birthdate presumed for Ealdgyth. The brothers would then be 17 and 19 when Florence writes that on the eve of 20 Sep 1066, "before the king's arrival, the two brothers, Edwin and Morcar, at the head of a large army, fought a battle with the Norwegians on the northern bank of the river Ouse, near York.". If they were indeed brash young teenagers who wouldn't take advice from anyone, that could explain why they lost that battle. 5 days later, Harold defeated the same enemy at Stanford Bridge. Killing, among others, 'earl Tosti', the man whose earldom of Northumbria had been granted Morcar les than a year earlier."
 ==="Florence" (John) of Worcester===

@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 *John P Ravilous in a posting to Gen-Med 15 Aug 2007 states : "In the listing provided in Domesday Book (1086) of the lands of the Church of Coventry, in Stanley Hundred, there is a description of the land of Binley.  The text states in part,  "Aldgid, the wife of Grifin, held this land. The Abbey bought it of Osbern the son of Richard", citing[http://books.google.com/books?id=zQMIAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA14&dq=aldgid+uxor&ei=eJfDRrfqKIb07gKp8_XTDw&ie=ISO-8859-1 William Reades, trans. Domesday Book, for the County of Warwick] (Coventry: W. Reader, 1835), p. 14: 'Ipsa eccl'a ten' BILVEIE. Ibi sunt iii hidae T'ra e' viii car'. In d'nio e' una car' et iiii serui et x uill'i et vi bord' eu' v car'. Ibi viii ac' p'ti. Silua dimid' leu'u l'g' et una  q'rent' lat'. T. R. E. et modo ual' LX solid'.  Hanc tra' tenuit. Aldgid uxor Grifin. Hanc abb' emit ab 0' filio Ricardi.  Ipsa eccl'a ten' in CONDONE iii virg' t'rae. T'ra e' ii car'. Ibi sunt iiii uill'i et vi bord' eu' ii car' et i fiemo. Silua iii q'r' et xxx p'tic' l'g' et iii q'rent' lat'. Valuit et ual' xx solid'.'
-*Terry Booth posting to Gen-Med 25 Aug 2007 states : "While we can't prove her b. and m. dates, Domesday Book provides proof she d. aft 14 Oct 1066 Battle of Hastings. "[Nottingham Domesday], i, 249r (11-37) Robert of Stafford; Madeley (in Checkley). TRW Robert of Stafford holds a half hide in Madeley, and Wulfheah holds from him. Godgifu held it TRE. She even held it after the coming of King William into England, but she could not withdraw from her land." If the translation can be trusted, this proves she d. after Harold's death at Hastings. The statement also proves her ownership status was sharply reduced after the conquest (suggesting her lands had been confiscated). See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA240,M1 link]"
+*Terry Booth posting to Gen-Med 25 Aug 2007 states :
-*"The Lincolnshire Domesday Book starts with a notable statement of the king's special laws (and 1086 real estate tax rate) applicable to all properties in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. It also has this very important statement "Here is noted who had [i.e. TRE] soke and sake and toll and team and the king's custom of two pennies [i.e. full property rights]; the Archbishop of York over his manors; the Countess Godgifu over Newark Wapentake; Ulf Fenisc over his land; the Abbot of Perborough over Collingham; the Abbot of Burton; Earl Hugh over Markheaton (Derbysh.); the Bishop of Chester; Toki; Swein son of Svavic; Siward Barn; Wulfric Cild; Alsige of Illing; Leofwine son of ASlwine; Azur son of Svala; Countess Aelfgifu; Countess Gode; Alsige son of Karski over Worksop; Henry de Ferrers over Ednaston [Derbysh],Doveridge [Derbysh]and Brailsford [Derbysh]; Walter d'Aincourt over Branby, Morton [Derbysh] and Pilsley (in North Wingfield) [Derbysh]; [total of 19 owners with some interesting associations]. Of these, none could have the earl's [presumably earl Harold, who was never identified as king in Domesday] third penny TRE, unless by his consent, and that for as long as he should live, except for the Archbishop of York, Ulf Fenisc and Countess Godgifu." This proves Godgifu survived her son Aelfgar, and that she held superior rights to every other property owner except two - the Archbishop of York and Ulf Fenisc. [Related question - who was Ulf Fenisc to be so highly ranked?] To hold the earl's third pennie would seem to date the record to the short-lived reign of 'earl' Harold. Aelfgar's widow, Countess Aelfgifu, is also proven to be alive on the date of this record. See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA217,M1. link]"
+<blockquote>The Lincolnshire Domesday Book starts with a notable statement of the king's special laws (and 1086 real estate tax rate) applicable to all properties in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. It also has this very important statement "Here is noted who had [i.e. TRE] soke and sake and toll and team and the king's custom of two pennies [i.e. full property rights]; the Archbishop of York over his manors; the Countess Godgifu over Newark Wapentake; Ulf Fenisc over his land; the Abbot of Perborough over Collingham; the Abbot of Burton; Earl Hugh over Markheaton (Derbysh.); the Bishop of Chester; Toki; Swein son of Svavic; Siward Barn; Wulfric Cild; Alsige of Illing; Leofwine son of ASlwine; Azur son of Svala; Countess Aelfgifu; Countess Gode; Alsige son of Karski over Worksop; Henry de Ferrers over Ednaston [Derbysh],Doveridge [Derbysh]and Brailsford [Derbysh]; Walter d'Aincourt over Branby, Morton [Derbysh] and Pilsley (in North Wingfield) [Derbysh]; [total of 19 owners with some interesting associations]. Of these, none could have the earl's [presumably earl Harold, who was never identified as king in Domesday] third penny TRE, unless by his consent, and that for as long as he should live, except for the Archbishop of York, Ulf Fenisc and Countess Godgifu." This proves Godgifu survived her son Aelfgar, and that she held superior rights to every other property owner except two - the Archbishop of York and Ulf Fenisc. [Related question - who was Ulf Fenisc to be so highly ranked?] To hold the earl's third pennie would seem to date the record to the short-lived reign of 'earl' Harold. Aelfgar's widow, Countess Aelfgifu, is also proven to be alive on the date of this record. See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA217,M1. link]"</blockquote>
 ===Orderic Vitalis===

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 3 September 2007
Line 44:		Line 44:

	*Terry Booth posting to Gen-Med 25 Aug 2007 states : "While we can't prove her b. and m. dates, Domesday Book provides proof she d. aft 14 Oct 1066 Battle of Hastings. "[Nottingham Domesday], i, 249r (11-37) Robert of Stafford; Madeley (in Checkley). TRW Robert of Stafford holds a half hide in Madeley, and Wulfheah holds from him. Godgifu held it TRE. She even held it after the coming of King William into England, but she could not withdraw from her land." If the translation can be trusted, this proves she d. after Harold's death at Hastings. The statement also proves her ownership status was sharply reduced after the conquest (suggesting her lands had been confiscated). See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA240,M1 link]"		*Terry Booth posting to Gen-Med 25 Aug 2007 states : "While we can't prove her b. and m. dates, Domesday Book provides proof she d. aft 14 Oct 1066 Battle of Hastings. "[Nottingham Domesday], i, 249r (11-37) Robert of Stafford; Madeley (in Checkley). TRW Robert of Stafford holds a half hide in Madeley, and Wulfheah holds from him. Godgifu held it TRE. She even held it after the coming of King William into England, but she could not withdraw from her land." If the translation can be trusted, this proves she d. after Harold's death at Hastings. The statement also proves her ownership status was sharply reduced after the conquest (suggesting her lands had been confiscated). See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA240,M1 link]"
−
−	*"simple but wise answer to whether
−	~~Leofric had an uncited first wife. there is also a simple answer to whether~~
−	~~Godgifu lived to be 70 - she didn't have to, per items cited below.~~
−
−	~~While we can't prove her b. and m. dates, Domesday Book provides proof she~~
−	~~d. aft 14 Oct 1066 Battle of Hastings. "[Nottingham Domesday], i, 249r~~
−	~~(11-37) Robert of Stafford; Madeley (in Checkley). TRW Robert of Stafford~~
−	~~holds a half hide in Madeley, and Wulfheah holds from him. Godgifu held it~~
−	~~TRE. She even held it after the coming of King William into England, but she~~
−	~~could not withdraw from her land." If the translation can be trusted, this~~
−	~~proves she d. after Harold's death at Hastings. The statement also proves~~
−	~~her ownership status was sharply reduced after the conquest (suggesting her~~
−	~~lands had been confiscated). See~~
−	~~http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA240,M1~~

	*"The Lincolnshire Domesday Book starts with a notable statement of the king's special laws (and 1086 real estate tax rate) applicable to all properties in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. It also has this very important statement "Here is noted who had [i.e. TRE] soke and sake and toll and team and the king's custom of two pennies [i.e. full property rights]; the Archbishop of York over his manors; the Countess Godgifu over Newark Wapentake; Ulf Fenisc over his land; the Abbot of Perborough over Collingham; the Abbot of Burton; Earl Hugh over Markheaton (Derbysh.); the Bishop of Chester; Toki; Swein son of Svavic; Siward Barn; Wulfric Cild; Alsige of Illing; Leofwine son of ASlwine; Azur son of Svala; Countess Aelfgifu; Countess Gode; Alsige son of Karski over Worksop; Henry de Ferrers over Ednaston [Derbysh],Doveridge [Derbysh]and Brailsford [Derbysh]; Walter d'Aincourt over Branby, Morton [Derbysh] and Pilsley (in North Wingfield) [Derbysh]; [total of 19 owners with some interesting associations]. Of these, none could have the earl's [presumably earl Harold, who was never identified as king in Domesday] third penny TRE, unless by his consent, and that for as long as he should live, except for the Archbishop of York, Ulf Fenisc and Countess Godgifu." This proves Godgifu survived her son Aelfgar, and that she held superior rights to every other property owner except two - the Archbishop of York and Ulf Fenisc. [Related question - who was Ulf Fenisc to be so highly ranked?] To hold the earl's third pennie would seem to date the record to the short-lived reign of 'earl' Harold. Aelfgar's widow, Countess Aelfgifu, is also proven to be alive on the date of this record. See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA217,M1. link]"		*"The Lincolnshire Domesday Book starts with a notable statement of the king's special laws (and 1086 real estate tax rate) applicable to all properties in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. It also has this very important statement "Here is noted who had [i.e. TRE] soke and sake and toll and team and the king's custom of two pennies [i.e. full property rights]; the Archbishop of York over his manors; the Countess Godgifu over Newark Wapentake; Ulf Fenisc over his land; the Abbot of Perborough over Collingham; the Abbot of Burton; Earl Hugh over Markheaton (Derbysh.); the Bishop of Chester; Toki; Swein son of Svavic; Siward Barn; Wulfric Cild; Alsige of Illing; Leofwine son of ASlwine; Azur son of Svala; Countess Aelfgifu; Countess Gode; Alsige son of Karski over Worksop; Henry de Ferrers over Ednaston [Derbysh],Doveridge [Derbysh]and Brailsford [Derbysh]; Walter d'Aincourt over Branby, Morton [Derbysh] and Pilsley (in North Wingfield) [Derbysh]; [total of 19 owners with some interesting associations]. Of these, none could have the earl's [presumably earl Harold, who was never identified as king in Domesday] third penny TRE, unless by his consent, and that for as long as he should live, except for the Archbishop of York, Ulf Fenisc and Countess Godgifu." This proves Godgifu survived her son Aelfgar, and that she held superior rights to every other property owner except two - the Archbishop of York and Ulf Fenisc. [Related question - who was Ulf Fenisc to be so highly ranked?] To hold the earl's third pennie would seem to date the record to the short-lived reign of 'earl' Harold. Aelfgar's widow, Countess Aelfgifu, is also proven to be alive on the date of this record. See [http://books.google.com/books?id=YpI9-3hPiYkC&pg=PA454&dq=godgifu+1066+domesday&sig=6xVYj7YZMsv1rzxKfyggzMQjFtg#PPA217,M1. link]"