Playing with Fermat's Last Theorem

From RoyalWeb
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Some results from playing with Fermat's Last Theorem  
 
Some results from playing with Fermat's Last Theorem  
−
by Will Johnson, wjhonson@aol.com copyright 2001-4,
+
by Will Johnson, [mailto:wjhonson@aol.com wjhonson@aol.com] copyright 2001-4, all rights reserved.
−
all rights reserved.
+
  
 
(Condition 1) x^n + y^n = z^n
 
(Condition 1) x^n + y^n = z^n
−
(Condition 2) n prime and not 2
+
 
−
(Condition 3) x,y,z natural numbers, > 0
+
(Condition 2) n is prime and is not 2
 +
 
 +
(Condition 3) x,y,z are natural numbers and are > 0
 +
 
 
(Condition 4) gcd(x,y) = gcd(x,z) = gcd(y,z) = 1 that is, they share no common factors.
 
(Condition 4) gcd(x,y) = gcd(x,z) = gcd(y,z) = 1 that is, they share no common factors.
  
−
Theorem:  Given the above conditions, show that z-x and z-y
+
Theorem:  Given the above conditions, show that z-x and z-y are each and independently, either nth powers or n times a nth power.
−
are both and independently, either nth powers or
+
−
n times a nth power.
+
  
−
From Condition 3 and Condition 2
+
From Condition 3 and Condition 2 we have that
 
x^n, y^n and z^n are all greater than zero.
 
x^n, y^n and z^n are all greater than zero.
  
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
Expanding (d+x)^n and cancelling the last term, we get
 
Expanding (d+x)^n and cancelling the last term, we get
−
(Equation 5) y^n = d^n + nd^(n-1)x + (n 2)d^(n-2)x^2 + ...
+
(Equation 5) y^n = d^n + nd^(n-1)x + (n 2)d^(n-2)x^2 + ... + (n 2) (d^2)x^(n-2) + ndx^(n-1)
−
+ (n 2) (d^2)x^(n-2) + ndx^(n-1)
+
  
−
Since d divides every term on the right, it must also evenly
+
Since d divides every term on the right, it must also evenly divide what's on the left therefore  
−
divide what's on the left therefore  
+
 
(Result 2) d divides y^n
 
(Result 2) d divides y^n
  
 
Let (Equation 6) d = p(1)^l(1) * p(2)^l(2) * ... * p(k)^l(k)
 
Let (Equation 6) d = p(1)^l(1) * p(2)^l(2) * ... * p(k)^l(k)
−
be the unique prime factorization of d
+
be the unique prime factorization of d
 +
 
 
Then since gcd(d,x) = 1 this implies that
 
Then since gcd(d,x) = 1 this implies that
 
(Result 3) gcd(p(j),x) = 1 for all p(j) in d
 
(Result 3) gcd(p(j),x) = 1 for all p(j) in d
Line 45: Line 44:
  
 
Let (Equation 7) y(1)^t(1) * y(2)^t(2) * ... * y(m)^t(m)
 
Let (Equation 7) y(1)^t(1) * y(2)^t(2) * ... * y(m)^t(m)
−
be the unique prime factorization of y. Then  
+
be the unique prime factorization of y. Then  
−
(Result 5) each p(j) = y(o) for some o and  
+
(Result 5) each p(j) = y(o) for some o and therefore p(j) has a relationship to t(o)*n
−
therefore p(j) has a relationship to t(o)*n
+
  
 
If l(j) < t(o)n this implies p(j) divides nx^(n-1) which implies
 
If l(j) < t(o)n this implies p(j) divides nx^(n-1) which implies
 
(Result 6) p(j) = n or p(j) divides x^(n-1)
 
(Result 6) p(j) = n or p(j) divides x^(n-1)
 +
 
But, by Result 3, p(j) cannot divide x^(n-1) since to do so, since P(j) is prime, it must divide x which it is forbidden to do and therefore p(j) = n
 
But, by Result 3, p(j) cannot divide x^(n-1) since to do so, since P(j) is prime, it must divide x which it is forbidden to do and therefore p(j) = n
  
−
If l(j) > t(o)n this implies p(j) divides some other factor of y
+
If l(j) > t(o)n this implies p(j) divides some other factor of y as well which contradicts the Prime Factorization Theorem, since each y(j) was chosen to be independent of any other.
−
as well which contradicts the Prime Factorization Theorem, since each y(j) was chosen to be independent of any other.
+
  
 
The third case is left:
 
The third case is left:
Line 60: Line 58:
  
 
Now if p(j) = n then n divides d and also n divides y which means that  
 
Now if p(j) = n then n divides d and also n divides y which means that  
−
n^n divides y^n
+
n^n divides y^n therefore the right hand side of Equation 5 must also be divisible by n^n.  Trying each successive n^q one by one we see that actually n^(n-1) must divide d since none of these n's can divide x, since n divides d and result 1 says that x and d have no common factors, and exactly one can divide the n coefficient in the last term of Equation 5.
−
therefore the right hand side of Equation 5 must also be  
+
 
−
divisible by n^n.  Trying each successive n^q one by one we  
+
(Result 8) Therefore, we have shown, for each element of the prime factorization of d, that either:
−
see that actually n^(n-1) must divide d since none of these
+
p(j) = n AND l(j) = t(o)n - 1
−
n's can divide x, since n divides d and result 1 says that x and d have no common factors, and exactly one can divide the n coefficient in the last term of Equation 5.
+
  
−
(Result 8) Therefore, we have shown, for each element of the
 
−
prime factorization of d, that either:
 
−
p(j) = n AND l(j) = t(o)n - 1
 
 
OR l(j) = t(o)n
 
OR l(j) = t(o)n
  
−
Now this is true for every element of the prime factorization
+
Now this is true for every element of the prime factorization of d, therefore:
−
of d, therefore:
+
(Result 9)  if n divides d the other elements of its prime factorization must be nth powers so there exists an e such that d = n^(tn-1) * e^n
−
(Result 9)  if n divides d the other elements of its prime factorization must be nth
+
−
powers so there exists an e such that d = n^(tn-1) * e^n
+
  
 
Now tn-1 = n*(t-1) + (n-1) so this can become
 
Now tn-1 = n*(t-1) + (n-1) so this can become
−
d = n^(n-1) * (en^(t-1))^n = n^(n-1) * E
+
d = n^(n-1) * (en^(t-1))^n = n^(n-1) * E
−
if n does not divide d all elements of d's prime factorization must be nth powers so
+
if n does not divide d all elements of d's prime factorization must be nth powers so there exists an e such that d = e^n
−
there exists an e such that d = e^n
+
  
−
Now we arbitrarily chose y to act upon, so therefore choosing
+
Now we arbitrarily chose y to act upon, so therefore choosing x has the same result.
−
x has the same result.
+
  
−
Reducing equation 5, mod n, we get y^n congruent to d^n mod n
+
Reducing equation 5, mod n, we get y^n is congruent to d^n mod n
 
(Result 10) n divides d if and only if n divides y
 
(Result 10) n divides d if and only if n divides y
  
Line 102: Line 92:
  
  
−
The case n divides y is analogous to the case n divides x
+
The case n divides y is analogous to the case n divides x so we don't have to consider them both.
−
so we don't have to consider them both.
+
  
 
Case 1 n divides y
 
Case 1 n divides y
 
(Equation 1) x^n + y^n = (d+x)^n-x^n =  (n^(tn-1)*e^n + x)^n = z
 
(Equation 1) x^n + y^n = (d+x)^n-x^n =  (n^(tn-1)*e^n + x)^n = z
−
  Also y = n^t * Y for some Y and t > 0
+
 
−
x^n + (n^t * Y)^n = (n^(tn-1)*e^n + x)^n
+
Also y = n^t * Y for some Y and t > 0
−
(n^t * Y)^n = ....n^(tn)e^n * x
+
x^n + (n^t * Y)^n = (n^(tn-1)*e^n + x)^n
−
Y^n = ....e^n * x
+
(n^t * Y)^n = ....n^(tn)e^n * x
 +
Y^n = ....e^n * x
 
(Equation 2) x^n + y^n = (d+y)^n - y^n = (f^n + y)^n = z
 
(Equation 2) x^n + y^n = (d+y)^n - y^n = (f^n + y)^n = z
  
 
Setting these equal we have  (n^(tn-1)*e^n + x)^n = (f^n + y)^n
 
Setting these equal we have  (n^(tn-1)*e^n + x)^n = (f^n + y)^n
−
Taking the nth root we get
+
Taking the nth root we get n^(tn-1)*e^n + x = f^n + y = z
−
n^(tn-1)*e^n + x = f^n + y = z
+
  
 
Now since n^t divides y, let y = Yn^t then substituting we have
 
Now since n^t divides y, let y = Yn^t then substituting we have
Line 122: Line 111:
 
Let n = 2 to get
 
Let n = 2 to get
 
2^(2t-1)*e^2 + x = f^2 + 2^tY
 
2^(2t-1)*e^2 + x = f^2 + 2^tY
−
for the case z-x = n we have n^(tn-1)*e^n = n implies tn-1 = 1
+
for the case z-x = n we have n^(tn-1)*e^n = n implies tn-1 = 1 which is only solved if t = 1 and n = 2
−
which is only solved if t = 1 and n = 2
+
 
 
let t = 1 and n = 3 then 3^2 * e^3 = 9e^3
 
let t = 1 and n = 3 then 3^2 * e^3 = 9e^3
 
x^3 + y^3 = (9e^3 + x)^3 = 9^3e^9 + 3*9^2e^6x + 3*9e^3x^2 + x^3
 
x^3 + y^3 = (9e^3 + x)^3 = 9^3e^9 + 3*9^2e^6x + 3*9e^3x^2 + x^3

Revision as of 16:37, 19 September 2008

Personal tools
MOOCOW
Google AdSense