Ahmad Sohrab

From RoyalWeb
Jump to: navigation, search
(New History Society)
(Lawsuit)
Line 29: Line 29:
 
This suit was filed in the Supreme Court of New York County.  The judge granted a motion to dismiss, stating that "the plaintiffs have no right to a monopoly of the name of a religion.  The defendants, who purport to be members of the same religion, have an equal right to use the name of the religion..."
 
This suit was filed in the Supreme Court of New York County.  The judge granted a motion to dismiss, stating that "the plaintiffs have no right to a monopoly of the name of a religion.  The defendants, who purport to be members of the same religion, have an equal right to use the name of the religion..."
  
The judge mentioned that the complaint could be further amended ([http://bahai-library.com/?file=sohrab_vs_us-nsa_1941 Bahai Library "Sohrab Vs NSA"]) and the NSA appealed ([http://www.h-net.msu.edu/~bahai/diglib/books/P-T/S/sohrab/BS247.gif H-Net "Sohrab BS247"]) but the Appellate Court affirmed the decision of the lower court.
+
The judge mentioned that the complaint could be further amended ([http://bahai-library.com/?file=sohrab_vs_us-nsa_1941 Bahai Library "Sohrab Vs NSA"]) and the NSA appealed ([http://www.h-net.msu.edu/~bahai/diglib/books/P-T/S/sohrab/BS247.gif H-Net "Sohrab 'Broken Silence' page 247"]) but the Appellate Court affirmed the decision of the lower court.
  
 
===Collaboration with other opponents of Shoghi Effendi===
 
===Collaboration with other opponents of Shoghi Effendi===

Revision as of 17:49, 11 January 2008

Personal tools
MOOCOW
Google AdSense