Douglas Richardson, awaiting answers
From RoyalWeb
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
On 29 October 2007, Richardson sent a message : C.P. Addition: Marriage date of Hugh le Despenser & Isabel de Beauchamp. This message, sent to soc.genealogy.medieval soc.history.medieval alt.history.british.alt.talk.royalty and gen-medieval, contained the following passage | On 29 October 2007, Richardson sent a message : C.P. Addition: Marriage date of Hugh le Despenser & Isabel de Beauchamp. This message, sent to soc.genealogy.medieval soc.history.medieval alt.history.british.alt.talk.royalty and gen-medieval, contained the following passage | ||
"For interest's sake, the following is a list of the numerous 17th Century New World colonists that descend from Sir Hugh le Despencer and his wife, Isabel de Beauchamp. For the connecting links down to the indivudual colonists, please see my book, Magna Carta Ancestry (2005), which is available for purchase directly through me." | "For interest's sake, the following is a list of the numerous 17th Century New World colonists that descend from Sir Hugh le Despencer and his wife, Isabel de Beauchamp. For the connecting links down to the indivudual colonists, please see my book, Magna Carta Ancestry (2005), which is available for purchase directly through me." | ||
| + | |||
| + | 7.Douglas Richardson (29 October 2007): "My research indicates that the Fitzalan family dropped the surname Fitzalan, in favor of Arundel about 1313. Thereafter all members of the family were known exclusively as Arundel (or de Arundel)." Will Johnson (30 October 2007): "But you didn't mention that among historians, you appear to be singularly alone in this theory. Isn't that a bit odd? | ||
