Douglas Richardson, awaiting answers
From RoyalWeb
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
10.John Briggs (11 November 2007) asked: "As it was the Court of the King's Bench, are you absolutely sure that the King himself was sitting on it?" At first Richardson replied: "Yes, I'm quite sure. The published account twice states that John Sparrowhawk was brought "before the king." | 10.John Briggs (11 November 2007) asked: "As it was the Court of the King's Bench, are you absolutely sure that the King himself was sitting on it?" At first Richardson replied: "Yes, I'm quite sure. The published account twice states that John Sparrowhawk was brought "before the king." | ||
When told Richardson had misrepresented the situation, he removed his original reply from the Google archives, re-wrote his reply, incorporating information given to him, re-send it to gen-med pretending that this was what his opinion was, without acknowledging he had been wrong in the first place, nor acknowledged the person who had put his straight. When his deception was revealed, he abused one of the people what had revealed his action. | When told Richardson had misrepresented the situation, he removed his original reply from the Google archives, re-wrote his reply, incorporating information given to him, re-send it to gen-med pretending that this was what his opinion was, without acknowledging he had been wrong in the first place, nor acknowledged the person who had put his straight. When his deception was revealed, he abused one of the people what had revealed his action. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 11.Robert O'Connor (14 November 2007)" I note that Douglas Richardson in 'Magna Carta Ancestry' at page 448 refers to the marriage of Isabel de Huntingfield and James de Paunton (Died before 1279) as being childless. | ||
| + | The various references tgo this couple at VCH Rutland II, pp 182-8 & VCH Northants, pp 249-52 suggest that they indeed had issue, a son Philip de Paunton who succeeded to his father's manor of Glaston, Rutland and Grendon, Northants. Perhaps James de Paunton had a prior marriage to that with Isabel de Huntingfield and it was from this unknown marriage that the son Philip descended? Can Douglas yield any light on this question? Many thanks, Robert O'Connor. | ||
